Cavender v. Phillips
New Mexico Supreme Court
1DissentBrice, Justice
To maintain his action to quiet title the plaintiff must have some title in the real estate that can be quieted. He must succeed on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary's. If he has no title then he cannot recover, though the defendant may have no title. If he does not have to show a title, good against the whole world, he at least must show one superior to that of the defendant. This court, in Abeyta et al. v. Tafoya, 26 N.M. 346, 192 P. 481, said:
“The rule is well stated by the Circuit Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) in the case of Ripinsky v. Hinchman,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Larson v. GlosIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Chicago v. CollinIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. HennesseeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Eaton v. Supervisors of Manitowoc CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.