Legal Opinion

State v. Goldman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2004No. ED 84495PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherri B. Sullivan, P.J.

S.M.H. and W.D.H. (collectively Rela-tors), individually and on behalf of their minor son, M.J.H. (Son), filed a Petition for Writ of Prohibition (Petition), along with Suggestions in Support and Exhibits, challenging an order entered by Respondent compelling Relators “to produce any and all copies of the contents of the social file of [Son] which are in their possession.” Respondent filed Suggestions in Opposition to the Petition, along with Exhibits, to which Relators filed a Reply. We issued a Preliminary Order in Prohibition, to which Respondent filed an Answer. The parties have briefed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Euclid Plaza Associates, L.L.C. v. MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. DavisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In the Interest of J.A.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SalmonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State Ex Rel. Ferrara v. NeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. KEYMOND S. BROWNMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API