Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Huselton

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 30, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Brien, S.

The issues raised by the objections filed to this account are determined as follows: I hold that the contestants are preferred claimants and should, therefore, be paid the amount of their claim, to wit, the sum of $506.64, in full. It is well established that where one of several parties collects the total proceeds of an insurance policy, payable “ as interest may appear,” he may be compelled to account for such portion which exceeds his interest, to the other person or persons interested in the insurance. (Cone v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co., 60 N. Y. 619; Tierney v. Home Title…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cone v. . Niagara Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Symmers v. . CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Tierney v. Home Title Insurance, New York County Courts1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Belpar Marine, Inc. v. Adams & Porter Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Hartsell v. Integon Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API