Legal Opinion

Walter Jon Pinkus v. Willard C. Pearson, Commanding General of Fort Lewis and Stanley Resor, Secretary of the Army

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 23, 1971No. 71-1105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Pinkus appeals from denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he sought discharge from the Armed Forces as a conscientious objector. He has exhausted his administrative remedies.

1. Pinkus’ beliefs, as stated by him, clearly bring his case within the rationale of Welsh v. United States, 1970, 398 U.S. 333, 90 S.Ct. 1792, 26 L.Ed.2d 308. While erroneous views as to the nature of Pinkus’ beliefs were relied on at some stages of the Army’s review of Pinkus’ application for discharge, the Conscientious Objector Review Board relied solely on its conclusion that Pinkus was not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John Dean Wallace, Jr. v. James Schlesinger, as Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. John Dean Wallace, Jr. v. James Schlesinger, as Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. John Dean Wallace, Jr. v. James Schlesinger, as Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API