Legal Opinion

Schenck v. Prudential Insurance of America, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

In an action predicated upon a policy of life insurance, the defendant insurance company counterclaimed rescission of the policy, based upon certain alleged misrepresentations as to the health of the insured.

The motion is now made by the defendant, pursuant to section 96 of the Civil Practice Act, for an order severing the issues in the action and directing a separate and prior trial at Special Term of *283the issues raised by the counterclaim, and staying the trial of the issues raised by the complaint. The defendant states that it is willing, if the relief it asks is granted, to stipulate that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Steamship Co. v. A. O. Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Acker v. . LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. MarzecNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Greenberg v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. Prescott v. GuibordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Insurance Co. of America v. GoldsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Davis v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API