Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Montcalm. (Smith, J.) Respondent was convicted of an assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than the crime of murder. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Respondent was convicted of an assault with intent to do great bodily harm, less than the crime of murder, upon Charles F. Rogers. The case shows that Rogers was in charge of fair grounds on which Ross and a partner had a small show, for which they had paid in part, and were to pay seven dollars more, of which two dollars was to be paid on the day of the difficulty. Rogers dunned them for this, and, they not being able to pay it, he got out an attachment, and came with the sheriff and others to have it levied. The sheriff, who was drunk and aggressive, seized their property, and attempted to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Balen v. MercierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People v. ConleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API