Legal Opinion
Flatbush Auto Discount Corp. v. McCarthy-Bernhardt Buick, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
Plaintiff sues to recover the balance due on a promissory note executed by one Stephen F. Massano *851to the order of the defendant, and bearing the defendant’s indorsement thereupon. In addition to the balance due on the face amount of the note, plaintiff’s action demands attorney’s fees and collection expenses as therein provided.
Plaintiff is a finance company and its certificate of incorporation in evidence indicates that amongst the purposes for which it was formed was (1) “to buy, sell, pledge or otherwise deal in conditional sales contracts, chattel mortgages, bonds and mortgages against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merchants Exchange National Bank v. Commercial Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Town of Putnam Valley v. SlutzkyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- N.Y. State Loan and Trust Co. v. . HelmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Meserole Securities Co. v. CosmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Audley v. TownsendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Flatbush Auto Discount Corp. v. McCarthy-Bernhardt Buick, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959