Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jo Ann Johnson v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. Of America

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1991No. 90-1971Published

1DissentMcMILLIAN, Circuit Judge

GIBSON, Circuit Judge, joins.

It may well be that insurance policies are “promises for the payment of money” within the meaning of Mo.Rev.Stat. § 516.-110(1). However, I remain unpersuaded. For the reasons discussed below, I would hold that the insurance policy in question does not contain a promise for the payment of money and, therefore, this action is barred by the 5-year statute of limitations applicable to actions upon written contracts, Mo.Rev.Stat. § 516.120(1). Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

The Missouri case law is subject to differing interpretations. Unlike the majority…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. Great Central Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Martin v. PotashnickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Parker-Washington Co. v. DennisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  5. Edwards v. State Farm Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API