Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Branstler

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 22, 1868PublishedCited by 13 opinions

CASE 62 — PETITION EQUITY — APPEAL FROM LIVINGSTON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 1 Marshall, 331; 4 Metcalfe, 147. Ckitty on Contracts, p. 7, sec. 8, and sec. 151. Revised Statutes, 1 Stanton, 208. 1 Met., 513; 6 Dana, 301. CITED— 14 B. Mon., 644; W.right vs. Arnold.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE ROBERTSON.delivered the opinion of the court:

At a decretal sale of a house and lot in Southland, Kentucky, for the benefit of the creditors of William Gordon, the first husband of the appellant, Mary Ann Connolly, she, for the purpose of facilitating an advantageous sale, authorized the salesman to announce, as he did, to the attending crowd, that she would not claim dower against any person who should become the purchaser. After that announcement, and on the faith of it, the property was well sold, and finally conveyed to the appellee. Some years afterwards, her second hus*703band and…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Segal v. ReisertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Rusk v. FentonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  3. Wilder v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Dulaney v. FiggCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  5. Floyd v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API