Legal Opinion

Moore v. Thorp

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 5, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Bill in Equity for partition.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.

Tristam Burges devised an estate in Providence, known as the Hoyle Tavern estate, to his wife for life, remainder in fee, one half to three daughters and the other half to those whom his wife should appoint by will. In January, 1873, Mrs. Burges and the three daughters joined in a lease for a term of fifteen years, covenanting therein to pay the lessee, at the expiration of the term, the fair value of a barn to be built on the premises by him, if it should then be standing. Mrs. Burges died in 1879, but the lease was allowed to run along to the commencement of this suit, just before the lease…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. . GuernseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Kurtz v. HibnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Dean v. O'MearaIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Elrod v. KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Borum v. King's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Ward v. Ward's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Rademacher v. TorbensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Pulse v. OsbornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API