Legal Opinion

Ford v. City of Hot Springs

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 1, 1988No. CR 87-212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Appellant, Zareepha Ford, was convicted in Hot Springs Municipal Court of three offenses under the Hot Springs Animal Control Code. Ms. Ford brings this appeal contending the provisions under which she was prosecuted are invalid as they exceed the city’s statutory authority to fix the penalty for offenses defined and punishable by state law.

In response to neighbors’ complaints, Ms. Ford was visited by Don Floyd, an employee of the Hot Springs Animal Control Agency. He found that Ms. Ford housed at least forty cats and dogs in her home. He testified that newspapers soiled…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wright v. BurtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1997
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API