Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carter v. Huntington Title & Escrow, LLC

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 14, 2011No. 116, September Term, 2010Published

1Dissent

ADKINS, J., dissenting, in which BELL, C.J., joins.

When a plaintiff seeking a remedy under the Insurance Code also asserts a cause of action in negligent misrepresentation, the administrative remedy is concwrent with the judicial remedy. See Zappone v. Liberty Life Ins. Co., 349 Md. 45, *63966-68, 706 A.2d 1060, 1071 (1998). Here, Carter successfully alleged negligent misrepresentation, and thus, under Zappone, he is not required to first pursue administrative remedies. Because the majority ignores the Zappone rule, and effectively forecloses a judicial remedy that is an equal or more efficient…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Zappone v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Randleman v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  5. Giant Food, Inc. v. Ice King, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API