People v. Heidgen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that his Alford plea (see North Carolina v Alford, 400 US 25 [1970]) was invalid because it was involuntary and because the record did not contain sufficient proof of guilt, insofar as the defendant did not move to withdraw the plea (People v Bunn, 79 AD3d 1143 [2010]; People v Harris, 79 AD3d 1069 [2010]; People v Higgs, 266 AD2d 233 [1999]). In any event, the plea was voluntary, inasmuch as the County Court ensured that the defendant discussed the plea with his counsel, understood the ramifications…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. BunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. HiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.