Legal Opinion

Miller v. Magee

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Albany county; Edwards, Justice. Martin M. Miller sued Irving Magee on three promissory notes.

Read the full summary

Appeal from circuit court, Albany county; Edwards, Justice. Martin M. Miller sued Irving Magee on three promissory notes. The ease was heard by the court without a jury, and the following opinion rendered: “Edwards, J. This action is brought on three promissory notes: one made by Abram Magee, Arthur Magee, and Irving Magee, dated April 1, 1869, payable, one year after date, to M. M. Miller, or bearer, for $1,200, with interest; one made by Abram Magee and Irving Magee, dated January 11,1866, payable, one year after date, to Martin M. Miller, or bearer, for $1,000, with interest; the other…

1Opinion of the CourtIngalls, J.

An examination of this case has led us to the conclusion that the same was correctly decided at the circuit, both in regard to the merits and the law applied thereto. The opinion of the learned justice, delivered upon the decision, seems to contain all which is necessary to be said in disposing of the appeal. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stubblefield v. McAuliffWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bender v. BlessingNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Maciel v. KaluaHawaii Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Murdock v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Porter v. FrazerNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API