Legal Opinion

Imad Hamzi v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 17, 1999No. 99-9133PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Minnesota Life”) moves to dismiss this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. We grant the motion.

Appellant Imad Hamzi, who failed to file a notice of appeal from the civil judgment within the time prescribed by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), thereafter filed an ex parte motion in the district court for an extension of time under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5). Minnesota Mutual argues that the rules did not allow Hamzi to make that motion ex parte, and that his doing so was a jurisdictional defect that deprived the district court of authority to grant an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Timothy Malone v. John Avenenti, Warden Robert Corbin, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Alice Hable v. Peter C. Pairolero, M.D., and R. Michael King, M.D., Alice Hable v. Peter C. Pairolero, M.D., and R. Michael King, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. John Oda v. Transcon Lines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. Toby Cohen v. Empire Blue Cross and Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. H.T. Truett, Sr. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walker v. SenkowskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Walker v. SenkowskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API