Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Daniel A. Beck

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 10, 2015No. Appellate Case 2014-001912; 27529PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent self-reported misuse of his trust account. He and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) stipulated the facts, and at the Panel Hearing the sole issue was the appro priate sanction. The Panel found that mitigating factors outweighed aggravating factors, and recommended Respondent be suspended for three years, retroactive to the date he was indefinitely suspended, 1 and that several other conditions be imposed. 2 ODC has taken exception to the three-year suspension recommendation, and contends that disbarment, retroactive to September 2, 2011, is the appropriate sanction. We agree…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Nathan JardineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. In Matter of BeckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Richard G. WernSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API