Legal Opinion

Schlivinski v. Maxwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the petitioner, Charles Schlivinski, by Hyman Schlivinski, his guardian ad litem, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 29th day of October, 1902, denying an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J.:

The applicant asks for a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling the superintendent of schools of the city of New York “to make and file in his office one complete list of all persons to whom ‘ Teacher’s License No. 1 or Grade B ’ has been issued * * * and to place thereon the names of both men and women to whom said license has been issued, according to their respective ratings * * * and to place thereon the name of the relator herein in its proper place.” The court denied the motion and the applicant appeals.

The respondent contends that the applicant’s remedy, if he has any,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People ex rel. Arden v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Lichtenstein v. JansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  4. Lichtenstein v. JansenNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API