Legal Opinion

Carroll v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 11, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

■ In tort. On motion to set aside summons.

1Opinion of the Court

*125The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

This suit was brought to recover compensation for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in being ejected by the-defendant’s servants from a train of the defendant running between New Haven and New York. The summons was served upon the engineer of the steamboat “Maryland,” a vessel owned by the defendant and used to transport cars-between Jersey City and a landing on the Harlem river. The engineer was an employe of the defendant, residing in Jersey City, and the summons was delivered to him on board the “Marjdand,” while she lay moored at her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Mulhearn v. Press Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  3. Norton v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ackerley v. Commercial Credit Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
  2. Westerdale v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. Baker v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Erie Railroad v. Van AllenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. Wright v. News Syndicate Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API