Legal Opinion

Richardson & Shoop v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 2, 1953No. 4723PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. MoFaddin, Justice.

The appellants, Richardson and Shoop, were jointly charged, tried and convicted of grand larceny. Richardson’s motion for new trial contains eight assignments, and Shoop’s contains fourteen assignments. We group and discuss all of these in convenient topic headings:

I. Sufficiency of the Evidence.' The appellants were charged with feloniously stealing and carrying away from the field of Willis Arnold, 179 dozen ears of corn, of the total value of $44.75. It was shown that at 3:15 A.M. the Van Burén city officers found the two ap-. pellants and a third person in a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Commonwealth v. DorseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. State v. BradleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Dowell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Claud v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API