Legal Opinion

Bank of New York v. LoFaso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover on a note and guarantee, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), entered January 11, 1989, as denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment is granted.

In 1985, the defendant Alfonso LoFaso executed an unconditional and continuing guarantee which, by its unambiguous *476terms, prohibited change or termination except by writing. LoFaso agreed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chemical Bank v. WassermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Norstar Bank of Long Island v. Prompt Process Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Bob Daubney Bowling Enterprises Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Extebank v. ZieglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API