Scruggs v. Bennett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The forthcoming bond upon which this suit was brought provided that the property levied upon should be delivered to the levying officer “at the time and place of sale.” It was undisputed that the property levied upon was worth more than the amount of the execution. At the trial the property described in the bond was not forthcoming as provided for therein. Counsel for the defendants in error insists that his clients did not breach the bond, because “property that is cumbersome, like a sawmill, can not be delivered at the place of levy,” and that “the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carr v. Houston Guano & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Young v. WaldripSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- King v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Grace v. FinleysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Wall v. FinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Seagrayes v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970