City of Chicago v. Berger
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, for photographs made and delivered. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
The defendant in error was plaintiff, and plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court, and will be so referred to hereinafter. The plaintiff is a photographer, and sued the defendant for certain photographs, which he claims he made for, and delivered to, the defendant. The cause, by agreement of the parties, was tried by the court, without a jury, and the court found the issues for the plaintiff, assessed his damages at the sum of $655, and rendered judgment for that sum.
The facts are substantially as follows: In June, 1898, Mr. Thornton, who was then the corporation counsel of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- George F. Blake Mfg. Co. v. Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cummings v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- City of Woodward v. Manhire Grate & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- O. M. Campbell Co. v. City of HarvardNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Baltzer v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- City of Chicago v. NicholsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906