Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Cottrell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 20, 2017No. Appellate Case 2015-000731; Opinion 27754Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE FEW:

I concur in the result reached by the majority. I disagree, however, with two points in the majority’s analysis.

I. Removal of Attorneys

First, I disagree that a trial court has “discretion” to remove trial counsel over the defendant’s objection as an exercise of the court’s duty to ensure the defendant receives a fair trial. This Court has never before recognized such discretion, nor has any court of which I am aware. In each case cited by the majority to support its holding, the trial court made a specific factual finding that the attorney was legally disqualified due to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Jimmy Lee Williams, United States of America v. Jimmy Lee WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API