Legal Opinion
Paparo v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 28, 1999No. CIV. A. 99-1597PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KATZ, Senior District Judge.
Before the court is defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s, motion to dismiss plaintiff Nancy Paparo’s complaint. Because the plaintiffs complaint does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the defendant’s motion will be granted.
Background1
Plaintiff Nancy Paparo filed a complaint against defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, seeking damages from UPS for wrongful use of civil proceedings under Pennsylvania’s so-called Dragonetti Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 8351-8355.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nami v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Holder v. City of AllentownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Rosen v. American Bank of RollaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Pawlowski v. SmortoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Larry Pitt & Assocs. v. Lundy Law LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018