Legal Opinion
People v. Selg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The decision to grant or deny a youthful offender application is a discretionary one (see, People v Parris, 109 AD2d 853), and here there was no abuse of discretion in denying defendant’s application for that relief.
As to defendant’s contention that the court erred in accepting his pleas, that issue was not preserved for appellate review because of defendant’s failure to raise it at Criminal Term (see, People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. ClaudioNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. ParrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. AriolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. DunlapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.