Legal Opinion
Tenenbaum v. Williams
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 20, 1995No. 1:91-cr-00037PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Defendants have moved, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54(b) and (6)(b) and Civil Rule 3(j) of the Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, for reargument and reconsideration of the portion of this Court’s Memorandum and Order dated September 30, 1994, which held that a caseworker who has lawfully effected an emergency removal of a child from her home without a court order must, nonetheless, provide notice to the parents and obtain judicial authorization before directing an invasive…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Diane Doe, Etc. v. Omer Renfrow, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Schonberger v. SerchukDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Davidson v. KeenanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Thompson v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Caribbean Trading and Fidelity Corporation v. Nigerian National Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tenenbaum v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- No. 97-55579Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Wallis ex rel. Wallis v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Kernisant v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.