State v. Walsh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Good-hue county, McCluer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The defendant was convicted under an indictment for the act of cutting and removing a section of fence on each side of a strip of land occupied by a railroad company for its railway track across the defendant’s land. The fence had been constructed by the railroad company to inclose the land thus occupied by it. The defendant appears to have removed the fences to facilitate the driving of his stock from one part of- the farm to another. On the part of the state, it is only claimed that the act of the defendant was crim*445inal by force of section 476 of the Penal Code, which, so far as need be…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- State v. EndSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. DahlstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. Certain Contraceptive MaterialsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.