Russo v. Cohen

As a result of the Special Term’s determination, candidate Hawkins had a plurality of thirty-four. One hundred and twenty-one ballots have been submitted to, and passed upon by, the court with the following result:(1) Special Term held valid in favor of candidate Russo the ballot described as Exhibit 42. This ballot was marked with a blue pencil and is, therefore, clearly invalid and was so conceded by counsel for appellant.(2) Six ballots (Exhibits 46, 80, 86, 89, 104 and 112) out of a group of fourteen for Russo submitted by appellant, held by the Special Term to be invalid, are held valid…