Legal Opinion

In Re: the Paternity of E.M.T. C.J.G. v. M.C.T.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2012No. 48A02-1203-JP-260Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: MARK R. REGNIER ANGELA WARNER SIMS Bingham Farrer & Wilson PC Hulse, Lacey, Hardacre, FILED Elwood, Indiana Austin, & Sims, P.C. Anderson, Indiana Dec 10 2012, 10:42 am IN THE CLERK of the supreme court, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA court of appeals and tax court IN RE: THE PATERNITY OF E.M.T. ) ) C.J.G., ) )…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Paternity of M.O.B.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. H.M.C. v. CurtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Patternity of J.C. v. Van WinkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API