Legal Opinion

Follansbee v. Plymouth District Court

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 31, 2004No. 2003-473PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

These consolidated cases are before the court on interlocutory transfer without ruling. See Sup. Ct. R. 9. The plaintiffs, David Follansbee and Richard Kelly, each sought to vacate a bail commissioner’s fee charged pursuant to RSA 597:20 (Supp. 2003). Following denial of their motions by the Plymouth and Lebanon District Courts, respectively, the plaintiffs filed petitions for writs of mandamus in the superior court challenging the constitutionality of RSA 597:20. The *366superior court converted the matters to petitions for declaratory judgment and joined them for all further proceedings.

Pursuant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schilb v. KuebelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broussard v. Parish of OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. In re Sandra H.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. Niemiec v. KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. State v. BasinowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Akins v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  2. LaMarche v. McCarthySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API