Legal Opinion

Reamer v. Walter H. C. Griffiths, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1930No. 22307. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for wrongful death claimed to have been due to negligence chargeable to the defendant. The action was brought on behalf of O. E. Reamer, the husband of Cora Reamer, deceased, their daughter and two sons. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the husband in the sum of $5,000, and in favor of the daughter in the sum of $1,000. As to the two sons, the verdict was in favor of the defendant. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial were made and overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bortle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Sadler v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Castner v. Tacoma Gas & Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Erickson v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. United States v. Moscow-Idaho Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Settles v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Wilson v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API