Legal Opinion

Vandenbark v. Busiek

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 3, 1942No. 7739PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires the construction of two instruments, one a deed containing a reservation, and the other a stipulation, executed a month after the first for the purpose of clarifying the reservation. Many conveyances are involved in the proceeding to support the rights claimed in the bill to quiet title and the cross complaint for similar relief, but the ultimate decision of the appeal must rest upon our construction of the deed as affected by the stipulation.

On December 16, 1938, appellees Busiek and wife and Rose and wife, the owners in fee of certain parcels of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Toothman v. CourtneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Waggoner Estate v. Wichita CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Ohio Oil Co. v. DaugheteeIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. Manley Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Transcontinental Oil Co. v. EmmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simson v. LangholfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  2. Corlett v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. United States v. Glenn Jones, Trustee of the Independent Plow, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. Midwest-Radiant Corp. v. HentzeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Logue v. MarshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API