Eighty-Four Mining Co. v. Three Rivers Rehabilitation, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NEWMAN, Justice.
We granted review in this matter to resolve whether the Anti-Referral provision of Section 306(f.l)(3)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act 1 (Act) precludes payment for in-office physical therapy prescribed by a physiatrist 2 and performed by a physiotherapist, 3 both of whom the physiatrist’s professional corporation employed.
FACTS
Joseph Sciulli (Sciulli) sustained work-related injuries while employed as a coal miner by Eighty-Four Mining Company (Eighty-Four Mining). Afterwards, Sciulli sought treatment with Dr. William W. Frost, Jr. (Dr. Frost), a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Norristown Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Central Dauphin School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Finnegan v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Cash America Net of Nevada, LLC v. Commonwealth, Department of BankingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Zuver v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Pacurariu v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.