Legal Opinion

Eighty-Four Mining Co. v. Three Rivers Rehabilitation, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1998No. 0099 W.D. Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NEWMAN, Justice.

We granted review in this matter to resolve whether the Anti-Referral provision of Section 306(f.l)(3)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act 1 (Act) precludes payment for in-office physical therapy prescribed by a physiatrist 2 and performed by a physiotherapist, 3 both of whom the physiatrist’s professional corporation employed.

FACTS

Joseph Sciulli (Sciulli) sustained work-related injuries while employed as a coal miner by Eighty-Four Mining Company (Eighty-Four Mining). Afterwards, Sciulli sought treatment with Dr. William W. Frost, Jr. (Dr. Frost), a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Norristown Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Central Dauphin School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Finnegan v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Cash America Net of Nevada, LLC v. Commonwealth, Department of BankingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Zuver v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Pacurariu v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API