State v. DeFalco

Defendants were convicted on an indictment which charged that they “did keep a place to which persons might resort for gambling, with intent that such persons might resort thither for gambling * * They sued out a writ of error to review such conviction, and now apply for a certificate of reasonable doiibt, in order to be admitted to bail, pending appeal. R. S. 2:193-11; N. J. S. A. 2:195-11.

As constituting such reasonable doubt, they object to certain portions of the court’s charge, or omissions therefrom, but none of these has any real merit, the latter’s substance having been otherwise…