Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Gold (In Re Avis)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1999No. 97-2683, 97-2755Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHerlong, District Judge

I concur with Parts I, II, and III of Judge Niemeyer’s opinion and agree that the automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Code operated to prevent the IRS’s tax lien from attaching to the inheritance. Yet I disagree with the conclusion that the IRS had a secured claim to the extent of $1000. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent to Part IV of Judge Niemeyer’s opinion.

As correctly stated in Part IV of Judge Niemeyer’s opinion, the $1000 “represented the stipulated value of Avis’ interest in the Weir trust as of the bankruptcy petition date.” Ante at 724. Part I of Judge Niemeyer’s opinion,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowman v. YelvingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API