Legal Opinion

Post v. Wright

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1803PublishedCited by 1 opinion

An inquest had been taken in this cause, at the last sittings, in June, at New York

1Per curiam

All reasonable notice to attend and defend the suit was given. The cause was on the day docket, and there is no kind of excuse(a) why the defendant was absent. *157He had a counsel in court, and might have been there himself, with his witnesses. The defendant, therefore, can take-nothing by his motion.

Hoffman urged strongly the rigour of the practice, that it would operate only against the attorney of the plaintiff, that it was the first instance of such strictness.

The Court answered, there must be a first time in all proceedings; that they found it necessary to enforce their rules, and had made…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farnam v. DespardNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Loring v. WittichSupreme Court of Florida · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API