Legal Opinion

Cary v. Arrowsmith

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 15, 1989PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs James E. Cary and Patricia A. Cary1 from a judgment entered on the jury’s verdict finding for defendants, Peter M. Arrowsmith, M.D. individually and his professional corporation Peter M. Arrowsmith, M.D.,P.C.2 Plaintiffs sought both compensatory and punitive damages for defendant’s alleged malpractice.

The case went to the jury on the plaintiff’s theory (1) that defendant failed to obtain plaintiff’s informed consent to eye surgery and (2) whether it was negligence to prescribe for plaintiff’s post-operative *11use the drug phospholine iodide.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cardwell v. BechtolTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Poole v. Kroger Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Boyer v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Bass v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Huss v. GaydenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Shadrick v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kim Brown v. Christian Brothers UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  4. Pettus v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  5. Hunter v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API