Legal Opinion · Dissent

Everett v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1894Published

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Alachua, county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the-court.

1Dissent

ÍRaney, C.-J.,

dissenting:

T am unable to concur in the conclusion of the i majority of the court as to the competency of the ■■■wife of William H. Everett to testify against her husi band.

' The Revised Statutes, as the same were adopted by '■the Legislature, contained the following provisions:

Section 1094. Married persons shall be competent ■witnesses for or against each other in civil cases -wherein either of them is a party and is allowed to testify. See original in the office of the Secretary of tState.: Section 1095. No person in any court or before any ' officer acting judicially shall be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haworth v. NorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Sammis v. BennettSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  3. Steele v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API