Legal Opinion

John W. Eshelman & Sons, Inc. v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 18, 1983No. 82-2763PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal involves the interpretation of an indemnity agreement.

James Hicks, an Eshelman employee, sued Seaboard for injuries which he received while unloading bags of animal feed from a boxcar located on a sidetrack used to service Eshelman’s plant. He alleged that the accident occurred through the negligence of Seaboard when the boxcar on which he was standing was struck by another boxcar. Seaboard filed a third-party complaint against Eshelman and its insurer, Travelers, relying upon an indemnity provision contained in Seaboard’s lease to Eshel-man of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. University Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Middleton v. LomaskinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. L. Luria & Son v. Alarmtec Intern.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Joseph L. Rozier MacH. Co. v. Nilo Barge Line, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mitchell Maintenance Systems v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. ETIOLE INTERN., NV v. Miami Elevator Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Winn Dixie Stores v. D & J CONST.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Guerrero v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API