Legal Opinion

Joseph Ullmann Brokerage Corp. v. Zimbal

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 1, 1952Published

1Opinion of the CourtPaeella, J.

Motion by defendants for retaxation of certain costs and disbursements allowed by taxing clerk pursuant to modification of judgment of this court by Appellate Term on plaintiff’s appeal.

The defendants object to various items in the bill of costs and these objections will be taken up in the same order as they appear in the supporting affidavit.

Defendants’ objections numbered 1 and 2 as to the items of costs after notice of trial and to the trial fee on issues of fact are without merit. The right to costs and the amount to be taxed depend upon the statute in force not at the commencement of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Defendorf v. DefendorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Loring v. MorrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Sachs v. Screen Tek, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API