Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. US Med-Equip, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 26, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00114Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAYLOR AMBROSE, Case No. 1:23-cv-00114-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA 13 v. SETTLEMENT WITH REDUCTION IN ATTORNEYS’ FEE AWARD AND 14 US MED-EQUIP, LLC, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE CASE 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 18) 16 17 18 I. 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiff Taylor Ambrose (“Ambrose”), maintains this representative action against 21 Defendant US Med-Equip, LLC (“Med-Equip”) for penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys 22 General Act of 2004,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API