McCollum v. McCollum

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

It is unnecessary to enter into an extended discus sion of the law applicable to this case. That has been fully ¡and carefully done by the learned trial judge in the opinion on the motion for a new trial. It is not a sufficient answer to the plaintiff’s claim that it was sustained by his testimony alone. He was a competent witness and his evidence having been credited by the jury forms a sufficient support to the verdict. If, as he testified, the conversation between him and the appellant took place with reference to the note and check and receipt which were the…