Legal Opinion
Dunnom v. Thomsen
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 22, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Bill for Specific Performance.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. Submitted at the March term, 1895, of this court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary
April 3, 1894, the parties above named exchanged these instruments:
“ Whereas, Max Thomsen, of the city of Chicago, county of Cook and State of Illinois, has applied for letters patent for certain improvements in curling irons, etc.; that one application is Fío. 498,372, and there are two other applications which were applied for in the early part of March, 1894, the numbers of which are unknown to him; that for and in consideration of the sum of one dollar, the said Max Thomsen assigns, sells and sets over unto Oliver G. Dunnom, one-third of all right, title and interest which the said Max…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Watson v. WellsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Johnson v. SteffensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- John E. Burns Lumber Co. v. W. J. Reynolds Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
- Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. WeygandtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
- Lagow v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
- Landon-Sharp Machine Co. v. FrankenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
- Tascher v. TimermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896