Legal Opinion

Frishman v. Department of State

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1991No. 389 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Michael Frishman (Petitioner) appeals from an order of the State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons (Board) which revoked Petitioner’s vehicle salesperson’s license and assessed a civil penalty of $3,700.00. We affirm.

Prior to September 17, 1986, Petitioner, a licensed vehicle salesman, was president of Armar Motor Corporation (Ar-mar), a licensed vehicle dealer. Acting through Armar, as a vehicle dealer and salesman, Petitioner participated in an odometer rollback scheme where he purchased high mileage, late model vehicles, which were cosmetically…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zampetti v. CavanaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Hall v. ACME MARKETS, INC.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Sabatine v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Wills v. State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers & SalespersonsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PercudaniCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. Ted Sopko Auto Sales & LocatorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API