Tanberg v. Ackerman Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.
This case presents the issue of whether a plaintiffs failure to follow medical advice to reasonably attempt to lose weight to decrease back pain, thereby mitigating his damages, can be considered fault under Iowa’s comparative fault statute. The court of appeals thought plaintiff’s failure to lose weight was not such fault. We disagree and, therefore, vacate the decision of the court of appeals and affirm the district court judgment.
I. Background facts and proceedings. Plaintiff Bruce A. Tanberg was a guest at the Best Western Starlite Village motel, located in Ames,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aisole v. DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Armellini Express Lines of Florida, Inc. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Sanders v. GhristSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Shewry v. HeuerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Michael W. Kratzer v. Capital Marine Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Greenwood v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Meyer v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Ort v. KlingerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1992
- Duntz v. ZeimetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Kirk v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.