Legal Opinion

Clemente Global Growth Fund, Inc. v. Pickens

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 3, 1989No. 88 Civ. 5317 (JFK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KEENAN, District Judge:

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Clemente Global Growth Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”), has filed a second amended complaint alleging that the defendants and their tender offer vehicle, Grace Pickens Global Acquisition Partners (“GPGAP”), have violated sections 13(d) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(d), 78n(e) by launching “an illegal, inherently coercive and deceptive tender offer for Fund stock.” Second Amended Compl., ¶ 1. Plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from closing their tender offer…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,041 Sonesta International Hotels Corporation v. Wellington AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Wali v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mann v. Kemper Financial Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Biosafe-One, Inc. v. HawksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. meVC Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund I, Inc. v. Millennium Partners, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. Kapps v. WingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  5. Gabelli Global Multimedia Trust Inc. v. Western Investment LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API