Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Baldwin-Universal Consolidated Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

Proskauer, J.:

A siding agreement between plaintiff and defendant provided that the defendant agrees to return all cars placed on the side track “in as good condition as when received, ordinary wear and tear excepted, or to pay the railroad the cost of replacing such cars or putting them in such condition.” Two of plaintiff’s cars were damaged by fire without negligence on the part of the defendant. Plaintiff sues for the reasonable value of the repairs to the cars. The rule of law is stated by Williston on Contracts (Vol. 3, p. 3307): “A mere promise to return the bailed property imposes no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Susquehanna S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. Rapid Safety Fire Extinguisher Co. v. Hay-Budden Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API