Legal Opinion

Gronseth v. Brubakken

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1931No. File No. 6925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

Appellants John O. and Guri Brubakken, his wife, executed and delivered to Torger G. Gronseth their promissory note on January 31, 1916, for $6,000 due January 31, 1926, with ten interest coupon notes. The indebtedness was secured by a real estate mortgage. The defense interposed to the foreclosure of the mortgage is that the mortgage was materially altered making it void. Section- 910, R. C. 1919.

Written on the lower margin of the principal note is the following: “This note is secured1 by mortgage on Wij^ SE% and Ejá SW.JÍ of section 17 and NWJ4 section 20, all in 128 — 54, and lots…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gronseth v. BrubakkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Whitney Loan & Trust Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City v. Clark Investment Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City v. Clark Investment Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API