Legal Opinion

Fuller v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 21, 1984No. Appeal No. 2Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendant’s motion granted, with leave to plaintiffs, if so advised, to renew their demand for a bill of particulars. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiffs’ demand for a bill of particulars. The demand is overbroad and improperly seeks evidentiary material (see Bonafede v Stevens Buick-Cadillac, 90 AD2d 690); names of *728possible witnesses (see Frequency Electronics v We’re Assoc. Co., 90 AD2d 822); and matters on which plaintiffs have the burden of proof (see New England Seafoods v Travelers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New England Seafoods of Amherst, Inc. v. Travelers CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Philipp Bros. Export Corp. v. Acero Peruano S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Frequency Electronics, Inc. v. We're Associates Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Bonafede v. Jack Stevens Buick-Cadillac, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API