Legal Opinion

Mears v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1900No. 3413PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. William E. Riosaedson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, J.

This is an action for personal injuries received from a fall on the sidewalk of the appellant city, caused, it is alleged, by the negligent act of the city in permitting snow and ice to accumulate and remain upon the walk.

The charter of the city of Spokane provides:

“ Sec. 220. Sub. I. All claims for damages for personal injuries, or for injuries to property, alleged to have been sustained by the reason of the negligence of the city, or any officer, agent, servant or employee thereof, must be presented to the city council within four months…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Curry v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Noonan v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Miles v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. Wall v. Town of HighlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Weber v. Town of GreenfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hase v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cole v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lyons v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Stoors v. City of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Ager v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API